During battles, the game by then changes to some consistent procedure game. In Axis and Allies , the chief resource is cash, which is that the Main resource that might be taken care of.
The player should likewise regulate determined assets to be sure that the store of ammunition and gas for their fighters. Regardless, a hidden cost of cash and cost of upkeep, ammunition, and fuel is associated with each unit.
Same issue as everyone else. Same 'infogrames' error with virtual 32bit windows xp with original. The cracked. Actually own the play disc to this. Not sure where the installation disc is. Would that help anyone? I just tried running this on Win XP and I get the same error: please insert the infogrames startup disc.
In control of the Axis powers, players faces 12 additional scenarios, which present an alternate reality in which the Allies are ultimately defeated. When forces meet on the map, battles can be resolved by the computer or in real-time play. Real-time battlegrounds are dynamically generated, based on the actual environments of the locations in which they are set on the world map.
Of course, real-world tactics become even more important in this kind of gameplay. Also as in the Kohan games, troops may be lead by powerful "General" characters, who bring bonuses to the soldiers under their command and gain new powers as they successfully progress through the campaign.
Those of you who played through Kohan 2 will likely have no trouble diving right into this title as the gameplay design is virtually identical to that of Kohan 2. Those of you who read my review of Kohan 2 will remember that I awarded it with an eight out of ten. Although the game design is basically the same, something is lost in the translation to the WWII theme. However, because the game does start off with the already excellent design decisions that powered Kohan 2, it is at least enjoyable if not a must have title.
Axis and Allies has four gameplay modes; a skirmish mode, the requisite online multiplayer mode, the campaign mode, and the WWII mode. There is a map of the world and you start off by selecting one of five nations Great Britain, USA, Russia, Germany, or Japan and your choice of general for that nation.
Just like in Rise of Nations, you have army units that you can move into adjacent territories. When moving in to an unoccupied territory, you take it over.
If there are enemies in that territory, you have the choice of fighting an RTS battle or of having it quickly decided by the computer.
The more territories you control, the more money you generate per turn. Money can be used to upgrade your existing army, buy new units, or to buy new technologies. While having as many game modes as possible is a nice thought, in this case, as the format seems so familiar, and as there is nothing really new or unique to it, the WWII mode isn't really that interesting; a nice mode to have, but nothing really new.
Units are grouped into regiments, each with six or so troops, trucks or tanks. The only naval units available are battleships - which are little more than floating HQs. Trouble is, when the fighting starts, tedious drag-and-drop mass assault tactics and creeping defence building ensues, and once again an RTS betrays its genre, featuring very little in the way of the eponymous strategy. Engineers can build bunkers, airborne units can make paradrops, and you can use special powers at the crucial point in the battle.
But these are khaki-clad drops in an ocean of military mediocrity. For the most part, you're sat watching a massive clump of your chaps duking it out with a massive clump of the enemy's chaps. So can you at least play the original board game in the turnbased global strategic mode? It's been completely paired down to be little more than an excuse to jump from one real-time battle to another.
You can only attack one occupied territory per turn, and there's no air or naval combat. Horribly dull. And if you're an old fan looking for some nostalgia value, you're better off calling some mates, buying some dice and dusting off that dog-eared old board game.
This is a big plus, when games like A World At War drag on almost as long as the battles they attempt to emulate. So we were very excited by Atari's new plans to reintroduce the game to a new generation of PC war-gamers. It was a straight-up board game conversion, no more, no less.
So what now? Setting aside, the game differs from Total War in one key area - the 3D battles, which are set to follow the common RTS template where bases must be built and resources gathered before you can join a battle. It appears to be a wholly unrealistic way to wage what are supposed to be realistic battles, but the developer sees this as the only way to ensure the war is as enjoyable to play through at the game's conclusion as it is during the tense early stages.
In Total War for example, you could, after conquering a certain portion of the map, rely on numerical superiority to win the game with scant regard for tactics -and in doing so, effect a dreary anticlimax.
Although the global dynamic campaign will be the central focus of the game, requiring you to exercise both real-time reflexes and turn-based brainpower, Atari is planning to include traditional story-driven campaigns too. There will be one each for the joint Allied and Axis side, which in the case of the latter is set to take an alternate route through history culminating in victory - or perhaps stalemate - for the Germans.
Whether this includes the subjugation of Great Britain or Russia, or a Japanese invasion of America we're not sure - Timegate is being coy. However, it seems that unlike other WWII-themed games, this may well pull up a few welcome surprises. Of course, the full-scale war has yet to begin, with plans still being drawn up, so we reserve judgement till then.
0コメント